Do not be fooled, CaptureReality "normal" is better quality then Agisoft's "High" :-) I am comparing Agisoft's high mode to CaptureReality's normal mode and Agisoft's UltraHigh mode against CapturingReality's "High" mode. This has been done on my i7-5960X (8 core/3GHz), 32GB ram, Geforce GT980 ti system. I always thought this had to do that I did not have enough cameras looking between the arm and body, but clearly CapturingReality proves it can be processed fine. Significant increace of details in the models generatedīoth models are 100% raw models (no cleaning in any form or shape), As you can see Agisoft always has a tendency to close caps between arms and body. The results are just mind blowing in 3 separate categories:Ģ. We have now processed many scan sets with CapturingReality, from Clothed and Nude models, kids and many dogs. Now you might think that is a bit of an aggressive statement, but OMG what is it true.
As CapturingReality states themselves "Our Normal is what others call High, Our High is what others calls impossible". These "names" compare nothing to like Agisoft's Normal, High and Ultra.
(10X faster!)ĬapturingReality offers 3 defaults levels of generating a dense cloud: Preview, Normal and High. In agisoft this exact same set, on of course the same machine took 10.5 minutes to align! That is a huge increase in speed.
CAPTURING REALITY VS. DRONE2MAP SOFTWARE
Since September we have had the change to test out a new piece of photogrammetry software called CapturingReality and within less then ONE minute we where impressed! Yes, because that is all what it took to already just align the cameras (120) and create a basic sparse cloud. I have only been working for 2 years in this fabulous world of 3D scanning/photogrammetry and it quickly was clear to me that Agisoft Photoscan was everyone's favorite software to process photos into a 3D model.